+1 (888) 794-0077
« Return

Immunogenicity Assessment for Biologics Development: How to Reduce the Risk of a Clinical Hold

In 2019, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) revised its guidance for immunogenicity risk assessment (IRA) of biological therapies. IRA is required to help drug developers and regulatory agencies better understand the potential impact an immune response will or will not have on patients when exposed to the therapeutic. The guidance is important to keep in mind when planning your preclinical and clinical drug development, as failure to adhere could result in barriers that ultimately delay the acceptance of your Investigational New Drug (IND) application, putting your program on clinical hold.

Many aspects of the guidance were revised but in our whitepaper, we highlight the revisions focusing on the following areas:

• Risk assessment

• Statistical approaches to ascertain cut point

• Removal of long-term stability requirement

• Minimal required dilution

Positive control antibodies

• Development of assays to measure neutralizing antibodies

• Strategies for managing pre-existing antibodies

• Updates in documentation requirements

DOWNLOAD WHITEPAPER HERE

The FDA recommends that immunogenicity risk assessment and rationale should be provided prior to entering first in human (FIH) studies and submitted in conjunction with the IND. Previously, the FDA advised that sponsors should provide a rationale for immunogenicity testing rather than the risk assessment itself. The FDA also provided clarification that test samples during phase 1 and phase 2 studies should use suitable screening, confirmatory assays, and, where necessary, neutralization assays.

Learn more about Large Molecule Bioanalytical services


As a global company with operations across Asia, Europe, and North America, WuXi AppTec provides a broad portfolio of R&D and manufacturing services that enable the global pharmaceutical and life sciences industry to advance discoveries and deliver groundbreaking treatments to patients. Through its unique business models, WuXi AppTec’s integrated, end-to-end services include chemistry drug CRDMO (Contract Research, Development and Manufacturing Organization), biology discovery, preclinical testing and clinical research services, helping customers improve the productivity of advancing healthcare products through cost-effective and efficient solutions. WuXi AppTec received an AA ESG rating from MSCI for the fourth consecutive year in 2024 and its open-access platform is enabling around 6,000 customers from over 30 countries to improve the health of those in need – and to realize the vision that “every drug can be made and every disease can be treated.”

Related Posts

DAR Research on ADCs Using LC-MS

DAR Research on ADCs Using LC-MS

Antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) refer to conjugated drugs formed by linking monoclonal antibodies with small molecule drugs that exhibit strong cytotoxicity through specific linkers. Depending on the structure of the linker, ADCs can be divided into two types: fractured and non-fractured. This composition means that ADCs possess the targeting ability of monoclonal antibodies and the characteristics of small molecule cytotoxic drugs, or as they are colloquially known, “precision-guided biological missiles.”  This also makes the structure of ADCs complex and diverse, making the pharmacokinetics of ADCs extremely challenging and uncertain. Therefore, ADCs have garnered considerable attention as a new and efficient antibody-based drug. In recent years, with the successful approval of multiple ADC drugs worldwide, particularly since 2019, when a total of 10 ADC drugs were approved, a new wave of ADC research has begun.

Transforming Drug Development: How Smart Compound Management Safeguards Integrity and Boosts Efficiency

Transforming Drug Development: How Smart Compound Management Safeguards Integrity and Boosts Efficiency

In the current era of high-throughput screening and expansive compound libraries, traditional methods of compound management are becoming increasingly obsolete. Reliant on human handling and manual documentation, traditional systems often faltered under the pressure of scale, risking sample degradation, process inefficiencies, and delayed timelines. Early automation efforts helped address some of the procedural challenges by streamlining tasks such as weighing, plating, picking, and liquid handling, but bottlenecks remained. Persistent pressure points like sample integrity and process flexibility required more advanced intelligent solutions.